John and Ken
Thread started by
Roadblock at 08.4.08 - 6:59 pm
how did these assholes end up beeing pro bicyclist??
reply
That was awful radio, I can't believe people listen to that trash.
Graham08.4.08 - 7:03 pm
reply
Roadblock. I agree.
But at least they got that going for them. otherwise, fuck em.
Joe Borfo08.4.08 - 8:47 pm
reply
I like them and they can be helpful for us to the aggro drivers who listen to them during rush hour traffic. Their pro-cycling stance (other than John wanting to honk at crimanimalz on the freeway) has been more reactive to the drivers' responses on cyclists as second-class citizens. If you grab their podcast and check out their past shows, their take for cyclists have been great for us. It's like political human sacrifice on drivers who think we belong on the sidewalk. I'd rather listen to John and Ken for their take on cyclists than
Michael Savage wanting to run us over.
Noble Experiment08.4.08 - 9:05 pm
reply
aren't those the schmucks who recommended on the air that drivers open car doors into lane splitting motorcycles? Hard to keep the idiot talk show hosts straight, so maybe I'm off-base, but i don't think so. That's probably how they came to be pro-bicycle, too - penance in order to get their jobs back.
ideasculptor08.4.08 - 10:29 pm
reply
*realizes he had the sarcasm volume way too high, promptly lowers it*
now back to your regular programming, brought to you by, HANNAH MONTANA'S PRANK SITE.
Jazzy Phat Nastee08.4.08 - 10:33 pm
reply
Here is a little hint. They are called shock jocks. Reactionaries.
It is there jobs to get people all rawled up. Of course they took the position that would get the listeners pissed off, and want to call and continue listening through the endless commercials.
Thank God for commercial free radio. I <3 Pacifica!
sexy08.4.08 - 10:36 pm
reply