save the hollywood sign
Thread started by
thecrazywall at 02.15.10 - 11:01 pm
http://www.squidoo.com/TheHollywoodSign
https://secure3.convio.net/tpl/site/Donation2?df_id=1780&1780.donation=form1
reply
riding down those hills 38MPH not bad huh
LouisAve02.15.10 - 11:32 pm
reply
there should be a ride to the hollywood sign that would be tight.
thecrazywall02.15.10 - 11:33 pm
reply
There are many rides that go an have been to the Hollywood sign. •_•
@louis: just messing with you. The view is always great from up there. The bad thing is that you see all that smog
palucha66 responding to a
comment by thecrazywall
02.15.10 - 11:36 pm
reply
we just did a ride up there! for smashed up sundays! yesterday
LouisAve responding to a
comment by thecrazywall
02.15.10 - 11:37 pm
reply
Replace the sign panels with ones made from carbon fiber?
bentstrider02.15.10 - 11:43 pm
reply
Think about it... do you really believe that the city of Los Angeles would let this happen? It's a landmark that everyone around the world knows and comes to see once in their lives. Let the people who came to Hollywood to find fortune and fame, whether through acting or music (or porn or whatever...) to help fund it. But, please rest assured that it won't be going anywhere anytime soon.
July02.15.10 - 11:46 pm
reply
they wanna make some condos for paris hilton and her friends..that wat heard.lol
Huey55502.15.10 - 11:48 pm
reply
sp far those rich fuckls be winning they gots the moneys to buy the land and makle condos for their dogs. haha thats why they raising funds so we as one can buy the land. i think they said something about your name will be on the list as a person who bought the hollywood sign.
thecrazywall responding to a
comment by Volta
02.16.10 - 9:26 am
reply
THE HOLLYWOOD SIGN IS NOT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO SAVE! JESUS WHY DOES EVERY ONE THINK THAT
the peak to the WEST of the hollywood called cahuenga peak is privately owned and the owner wants to build mansions on it. this has nothing to do with the hollywood sign, which is on mount LEE. they want to add both mountains to griffith park.
superblueman302.16.10 - 11:13 am
reply
"To take full advantage of the incredible 360 degree views, the homes will in turn be highly visible to those down below. This will dilute the potency of the Hollywood sign, which as it stands now, is surrounded exclusively by green city-owned hillside."
That makes more sense. Seems developers bought Cahuenga Peak, next to the Hollywood sign, but can't afford to build on it? If the preservation fund can't get the money together, it goes back on the market this spring.
Why do douchebags always have to build their houses on the top of hills so everyone has to see them. Tasteful people take the overall aesthetics of an area into account an integrate their houses into hillsides and shape them to fit with the surrounding natural environment. Makes sense, so everyone gets a view but nobody ruins it for everyone. Uh oh, that sounds socialist - the Tea Partiers will be after me.
supersano responding to a
comment by superblueman3
02.16.10 - 1:02 pm
reply
-->
Ridazz Roulette!
SAVE THE PEAK
:]
look at that view!
save it!
yup
don't let it come to this!